![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Book 2: Gaudy Night, by Dorothy L. Sayers
Hm, yeah, I don't know whether I can say anything new about this since I discussed it before ;-) Oh yeah: HELL YES INTELLIGENCE *IS* SEXY. Also,I just love, love, love so many little details in this book and while reading I always love looking forward to them. Like when Harriet realises that Peter took her gown per accident, and then decides it doesn't really matter. Because it also signifies that Harriet realises - and that she realises Peter saw it this way all along - that as far as education and university rank go, they are equals, and that they could meet as equals in a marriage. Or when Miss de Vine tells Harriet it's bloody obvious she's in love with Peter. Or about every time Peter is happy when Harriet doesn't rebuff him. And the punt scene of course. So much the punt scene. I always have to restrain myself almost physically not to skip ahead to the punt scene and Peter's underlying elation afterwards. Also, Katharine was right, of course now I have to read Busman's Honeymoon too. Also it's made me all excited about the book about the development of university education for women that I borrowed from Caroline but haven't started yet, because Gaudy Night always makes me wish I could attend an Oxford women's college in the 1930s.
Book 3: The Secret Life of Bletchley Park, by Sinclair McKay
For all intents and purposes, this should be #2 because I read all but the last ten pages or so before I started Gaudy Night. It was a very interesting read and quite illuminating in some ways. (I also realise that some of the Bletchley allusions I made in Blackout wouldn't really have worked that way, but since I never named Bletchley in the story, I think I can get away with that :D) One thing I missed a little was - since I used to be quite proficient in Maths in another lifetime - a more mathematical analysis of how the codes were cracked and how the enigma encoding and decoding actually works. I had the feeling the author was a bit out of his depths there. But I can't really find a fault with that since the book never promised anything mathematical ;-) I'll just have to find Simon Singh's book on secret codes and then see if maybe the library has something more about enigma codes. I'll probably not get all of it but I'd like some more mathematical insights all the same. But apart from that, it was a really fascinating book! Thanks Caroline for lending it!
Hm, yeah, I don't know whether I can say anything new about this since I discussed it before ;-) Oh yeah: HELL YES INTELLIGENCE *IS* SEXY. Also,
Book 3: The Secret Life of Bletchley Park, by Sinclair McKay
For all intents and purposes, this should be #2 because I read all but the last ten pages or so before I started Gaudy Night. It was a very interesting read and quite illuminating in some ways. (I also realise that some of the Bletchley allusions I made in Blackout wouldn't really have worked that way, but since I never named Bletchley in the story, I think I can get away with that :D) One thing I missed a little was - since I used to be quite proficient in Maths in another lifetime - a more mathematical analysis of how the codes were cracked and how the enigma encoding and decoding actually works. I had the feeling the author was a bit out of his depths there. But I can't really find a fault with that since the book never promised anything mathematical ;-) I'll just have to find Simon Singh's book on secret codes and then see if maybe the library has something more about enigma codes. I'll probably not get all of it but I'd like some more mathematical insights all the same. But apart from that, it was a really fascinating book! Thanks Caroline for lending it!
no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 07:25 pm (UTC)ACK.
May just have to pull out the old paper copies from their dusty shelf.
:)
no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 07:49 pm (UTC)By the way, you've read this, right? http://archiveofourown.org/works/47057 It's pretty much canon as far as I'm concerned and I plan to read it as soon as I'm done with GN and then transition seamlessly to BH.
Seriously, I had so many other books I had already started and I'm just dropping everything to wallow in Peter and Harriet. It's most annoying and wonderful.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 09:27 pm (UTC)She's also written other amazing LPW fic!
I think the crack in her armour is even earlier? When she realises she doesn't want Peter shot dead by some gunmen, or lose him for her own better comfort after the nasty letter he sees?
During all these scenes when they negotiate the relationship, part of me wants to smash their heads together and yell 'KISS ALREADY' and the other half is like 'd'awwwwww'
no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 10:05 pm (UTC)I did forget about the scene in the restaurant over the nasty letter, though. That is part lovely and part hilarious. "Okay, I'm leaving then." "UM WAIT I know I said leave, but..."
no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 04:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 03:58 am (UTC)Read wikipedia about DLS. I didn't know she had a child out of wedlock and he was raised by her aunt and cousin.
She is such a fascinating woman! I think a DLS biopic could be fabulous.
I've read that fanfic but thanks for the suggestion. Will read between GN and BH.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 04:32 pm (UTC)Also, haha, sucked you in! ;-)
no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 04:02 am (UTC)If I could have invented my children, though, I think I wouldn't have done half as good a job. Only Aidan wouldn't be quite such an Eeyore.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 04:35 pm (UTC)But just the idea of Phoebe and her archeologist husband living and digging and raising children on equal terms together makes me giddy. Maybe that was what gave Harriet the subconscious seed of the idea that a marriage between equals could actually work.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-19 09:08 pm (UTC)But yeah, Harriet first has to enter a stage of mind where she won't instantly dismiss the idea of marriage to Peter. Not least because, with his constant proposing, saying no has become an automatic response for her where she doesn't even think about what to say, but only how to say it. But some time during her stay in Oxford, her mental state changes and she begins to see Peter - and more importantly, marriage to Peter - in a completely different light. Maybe it all starts with his letter (as you referenced above) and gets more momentum when she sees him in his gown, and then later that day realises that it doesn't really make a difference whether it's her gown or his. (Someone on the LPW mailing list, I think, once pointed out that in the 1930s, only an academic gown and a bathing suit would be garments that a man and a woman could ever have the same, which I think is a very intriguing thought. We don't really think about it because these days, it's so common to borrow each other's t-shirts etc. But it's fascinating that only in a garment that is essentially nothing but the naked body (even with the legs and straps and what-not of 1930s bathing suits) and the other for the university member, men and women can be equal. But I digress.) So I think the thought that when stripped of all else, in Oxford she and Peter will both be M.A.s who took a First, is what first makes her think about them as equals. And then of course on the punt later that afternoon she realises that she totally wants his hot body ;-)